The shape of the case is present; the evidence for it is not yet.
60 Developing · 78 Promising · 96 Strong
The weighted total, computed in code from the evidence ratings for this deck. The same file scores the same every time: the ratings are made once and reused, so re-uploading returns this number, not a near one.
Traction carries real weight behind Traction 7.2 of 10: 19 of 20 candidates placed and 70% retention are stated outcomes, not projections. Product 7.4 of 12 rests on a model tested at 71% accuracy and AUC 73% across 1,137 records, with an explicit target of 85% on 10K records. Value Proposition 3.9 of 6 and Market Opportunity 7.8 of 12 draw on matching time cut from 2 months to 2 weeks in a 24-person domestic pilot (73%) and a CAC of $333 against LTV of $3.7K (11x). Team 9.9 of 17 is backed by three named founders with domain credentials in AI and in the hiring vertical.
Defensibility 2.6 of 8 rests on a single unelaborated assertion of 'patent + trademark' with no claims, scope, or grant status given. Ask & Use of Funds 1.9 of 5 reflects that no total raise amount in USD or KRW appears anywhere, only the phrase '18-month runway to $1M run-rate.' Financials 4.7 of 9 is undercut by an unreconciled conflict: 2025 revenue is stated as both $67K and $75K near page 9, and subscription retention appears as both 80% (4 of 5 subscribers) and 70%+ enterprise re-subscription elsewhere. US Product/Localization Readiness and Team/US Execution Capability show no U.S. entity, U.S. pricing, compliance localization, or named U.S. hires in place, with most further U.S. validation — compliance-driven interviews, VC meetings, PoC signing — explicitly described as planned for a future trip rather than executed. Combined with an unstated raise amount and second-market figures marked 'planned' rather than achieved, the deck reads earlier than the seed stage selected, closer to a pre-seed shape carrying seed-level traction claims.
The deck invites a first question of what the actual raise amount is and how it funds the stated milestones — 3–5 paid US pilots by December 2026, one US advisor, compliance localization — since the only figure given is '18-month runway to $1M run-rate' rather than a total. A second question is which 2025 revenue figure is correct, $67K or $75K, and which subscription retention figure holds, 80% or 70%+, since the source pages do not reconcile either pair.
Colour reads how well the category is evidenced, judged the same way at every stage. Track length reads what the category is worth at Seed — Team at 17 points is the longest, Ask & Use of Funds at 5 the shortest. So a bar can be fully green and still contribute little, or red and cost a lot. Vertical rules mark where Traction and Go-to-Market cross into Moderate and High risk at Seed.
Significant customer, competitive, GTM, or execution validation is still required.